Tuesday, January 31, 2023
Monday, January 30, 2023
Sunday, January 29, 2023
Saturday, January 28, 2023
Springtime - The Names Of The Plague (Official Audio)
Hey
The blame gamer
Huh, the ill-shamer
The brave-killer
The grave-filler
The buck-passer
The eye-glasser
The sight-saver
The night raver
Oh these are the names of the plague
The faith-shaker
The rule-breaker
The duff ruler
The bluff fooler
The world-beater
The word-eater
The first aider
Uh, is the worst-paider
Oh these are the names of the plague (ah)
Oh, the spit-sailor
And the inhaler
The high fever
The deep griever
The dry cougher
The hat-doffer
The cold creeper
And the old-reaper
Oh these are the names of the plague (woo)
The youth-wrecker
The truth checker
The head-cracker
The lost tracker
The host-racer
The slow tracer
The job-loser
The lost boozer
Oh these are our names of the plague, hey
The cramped-homer
The spread coma
The room slayer
The doomsayer
The sick-tricker
The nit-picker
The mad chatter
The foil-hatter
Oh these are the names of the plague
The mask-hater
The nurse-baiter
The flock fleecer
And the palm greaser
The deal-lander, back-hander, wrong richer, song hitcher
The wrong-righter, song of a blame-gamer, earth saver
Oh these are the names of the plague
Thursday, January 26, 2023
Monday, January 23, 2023
Sunday, January 22, 2023
Friday, January 20, 2023
A public response to PM resignation. "stirred in that shit pot of the divisions, sexism, racism, ageism, abelism, protecting the big engine, class divide rich vs poor, oh dear, "
Shared with Public
"Sandra Coney
C'mon Simon Wilson, how on earth can Jacinda Adern be called the most divisive PM in NZ history? Headline: "How did the champion of kindness, end up "the most divisive leader in our history"?".She wouldnt hold a candle to Muldoon, have you forgotten?"
I'm going to respond to Sandra Coney, as someone who I don't know, but have heard of as a public figure, she's certainly stood up to corruption and represents a kind of mainstream consensus on my news feed. I'm not Simon Wilson, don't know who he is, I do remember Muldoon and yes he was very divisive, thing is SO TOO has Adern, which IS a real shame, cause yes she was a smart leader, BUT surly her actions as Leader can be evaluated now in light of the information that has broken through the layers of censorship, FOR OUR OWN GOOD! HAHA FOR THE GREATER GOOD HAHAHA FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD puke. Ardern openly promoted censorship, marketing over science and social division as the way forward. Ardern fired the medical community that actually followed the science and the money behind the flawed and corrupt vaccine program. They were not even vaccines FFS. But gene therapy the results of we have no f'n idea of. )And we're still calling it Covid, cause that's the brand of fear that works, when we're on to mild mutations, cause that's what mutations generally do, not get worse, but go buy some pain killer for your fever, cause that's what the industry says to do, and yet, that's not what is good science, good practice, effective practice. It's been a learning curve. Are we allowed to learn? Apparently not on the job.
"My assessment would be, for what it's worth, that she fell victim to a pervasive sense of individual entitlement. Although it looked like NZ was able to "pull together" during Covid, it evaporated in the face of cries that some NZers found any restriction on their freedom of movement unacceptable, even when it was necessary for the public good." - Coney
We really did rally together, months of no to little consumption was an anti capitalists like me dream. It was also satisfying in that extreme we've finally been to war grandeur that previous generations held over our heads in their celebrations of 'sacrifices' against fascism, that merely hid the daily ones we were suppose to accept under a democracy filleted and facilitated by capitalism. I'll never forget the argument I got into with a Green Council member, who stammered after my philosophical assertion that there was no 'greater public good' that once you leave the realm of good it's just bad + a moral band aid. His response was by the book, and stopped talking to me. My leaving quip was perhaps he wasn't suited for politics. But then again... It was glamorous sacrificing democratic freedoms, for the immune compromised, for the elderly, we marched our young and healthy into the corridors of myocarditis to the tune of an audible heart beat, without wincing, complaint or cowardice. Swine flu vaccine (1976), 1 serious event per 100,000 vaccinees, Vaccine withdrawn. Rotavirus vaccine Rotashield, (1999),1 to 2 serious events per 10,000 vaccinees, Vaccine withdrawn Covid mRNA vaccines, 1 serious event per 800 vaccinees, Vaccine officially promoted.* Nationalism running smoothly, well oiled machine.
"Business whinged on and on especially hospo, even though NZ did the unprecedented thing of spending millions of public money on shoreing up private businesses." - Coney
"shoring up" is that how you'd put the transfer of wealth to the tune of a thousand billion, to the already rich, a shoring up. There was talk of eliminating child poverty, already a spin on the unworthy unworthy unclean, so a trillion transfer to... who again... oh the leased man pram driving ute being, I can spot the creation of a capitalist super hero when I see it. Especially when I pay for it, materially and culturally.
""Freedom" became the liet motif of the entitled, not of the liberation variety you might call for if you lived in parts of Africa or S America, but of the Ayn Rand far right variety. Freedom to exploit and oppress while grabbing from the state when it suited them. ""
- Coney
I'm sorry but this 'it's worse in Africa" argument does show signs of moral bankruptancy, doesn't it? I mean if everyone went around breaking laws, rules of polite society on the basis that that's the way it was done it X country, couldn't we all really just say good bye to the veil of Democratic civility and just let the dogs roam openly where they will. Well they do, don't they..
"The ironic thing about Wilson's assessment is that in this day and age, the media is right behind this behaviour, blowing up trivia into matters of state, not providing proportionality but only inaccurate headlines with nothing to back them up. If the state is being bashed, then the media is principal cheerleader.
The real story behind all this is how NZ has degenerated from a nation which once celebrated egalitarianism, fairness, a decent life for all, into a country of entitled selfish whingers, who are interested in no one but themselves." - Coney
The delicious overwhelming irony of this point, WHO IS THE WHINGER! HA yes the bony finger of the wicked witch in the mirror appears to see herself as young and beautiful. It was you mainstream media consumer that refused to 'read' past the headlines bait and snare, it was you msm consumer who abandoned, egalitarianism, fairness, a decent life for all, remember parliamnet grounds, where you couldn't decipher a reasonable argument, grounds for descent from "greater good" apocalypse, your whipped up hysteria fed profound disenfranchisement and you still won't look at it.
"Jacinda Adern appealed to the New Zealand "fair go" traditions, but came unstuck because that had been replaced by "ME ME ME". "
- Coney
Again, irony, I hate irony have avoided cute ironic art culture, but here we are, back stepping with a vengeance, that MEMEME is the FUCKING CORE of actual health. You can't drive a tank over personal specific experience and expect good results. Especially when there is existing contradictory evidence that supports even the idea, that tank driving in this context is bullshit.
"This is not a story about a bad leader, but about the rot that has infected the best aspects of New Zealanders so they don't know a good thing when its standing in front of them, and who happily employ misogynist insults and threats against a young woman admired by the rest of the world." - Coney
I saw a great performer, like John Key she could deliver that upbeat charm, but was she a leader? Lockdown was too late to keep it out, to keep it out would have been worse, then we were delivered a faulty savoir package whose revelation surly must be the tiny straw threatening to break a large back. Don't worry that back has a backing that won't allow being broken, ahh capitalism, it's a love story we know so well. And again with the misogyny, we'll be fed stirred in that shit pot of the divisions, sexism, racism, ageism, abelism, protecting the big engine, class divide rich vs poor, oh dear, too simple, and yet why grasp it, when we need a hero, perhaps one in a mask will do.. who is it, you?
*Dr. John Campbell
*Dr. John Campbell
Monday, January 16, 2023
Sunday, January 15, 2023
The healing properties of plants are proven to benefit public health. Our right to use them should not be taken away by law and transferred to pharmaceutical interests. 2023 Therapeutic Products Bill MAKE A SUBMISSION!!
OPINION
Dr Guy David Hatchard
Guy is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He received his undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex and his PhD in Psychology from Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield, Iowa. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. His published work uses the statistical methods of the physical sciences to analyse social data.
An Open message to Parliament.
Why are they regulating natural health products?
How will the therapeutic products Bill affect us?
What does the public want?
The public are aware that research findings on diet, nutrition and lifestyle indicate that there are proven health benefits.
Over 50 per cent of the public use natural health products and alternative approaches to health care.
The public realise there are many traditional sources of information about what products can be used safely.
If an individual suffers from a chronic or serious illness, or simply wants to maintain health, they need to retain their options to research and choose the most effective treatment for them.
The new bill will regulate all natural health products that claim to benefit health.
This is an enabling bill. As a result, the government will appoint a regulator who will then decide for you what products can be sold and what health claims can be made.
Well, what will the regulator decide?
In 2016, the Ministry of Health published a draft list of 5500 approved and all restricted ingredients. Most likely, the decisions of the new regulator, when appointed, will be based on this list.
Let’s answer the public’s first question.
Are all these ingredients safe?
The 2016 Ministry of Health permitted list included 3000 synthetic and chemical additives.
A closer look shows that the permitted list includes many additives which are suspected of causing illness and cancer. Including:
- FD&C red No. 2
- Amaranth, No. 3
- Erythrosine No. 4
- Ponceau
All are banned in the USA by the FDA.
A 2007 study in the UK found a possible link between six food dyes, a preservative and hyperactivity in children. All these compounds are likely to be permitted by the bill.
Thousands of artificial fragrances and flavours have been approved, even though they have not been tested properly.
Here’s an example of a pre-approved synthetic product. This cheap popular drink is available in New Zealand supermarkets. All of its ingredients have already been approved by the Ministry of Health.
These include:
- Sugar: which predisposes to obesity and aggravates diabetes
- E330 Synthetic citric acid
- Synthetic raspberry flavour, effects unknown
- E211 sodium benzoate: implicated as a possible cause of hyperactivity when used with E122
- Colour E122 Carmoisine: banned in the United States, Sweden, Norway and Austria
- Artificial sweetener E961 Neotame: similar to aspartame and banned in organic products. US FDA application noted adverse reactions. Dr Mercola recommends this be avoided at all costs.
This bill will allow this synthetic product to be marketed as a natural health product.
We’re talking about serious health issues here. During the last 20 to 30 years, there’s been a huge expansion in chronic diseases, including cancers, diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression and other mental and physical illnesses.
No one knows the exact causes, but poor nutrition food, food additives and environmental pollution are all suspected.
Over 2000 new chemicals are registered each year. There’s been a rapid expansion in the use of chemicals in food and synthetic chemicals. Many of these have been approved without sufficient scrutiny.
Using discredited principles such as substantial equivalence, additives that are similar to but slightly different from natural compounds have been approved [although it] is well known that very small differences in chemical structure can cause serious side effects.
The bill requires the regulation of entirely natural ingredients already known to be safe, in other words, foods.
Under the bill, all ingredients have to be pre-approved. We estimate a supplier will pay $200 annually for each ingredient.
The probable minimal cost of making a health claim on the label will be $5,000 to the regulator for each application. And for each mild condition your product claims to benefit.
But you will not be allowed to claim that a natural health product can benefit a serious health condition.
If it is considered that your product has therapeutic value, you will pay around $100,000 to register it as a medicine. And only a medical doctor will be allowed to prescribe it.
An EU report found that natural health products are 45,000 times safer than pharmaceutical drugs; Despite this, suppliers will have to comply with pharmaceutical-style regulations and undertake frequent costly testing of ingredients and products.
Say you’re selling 300 product products to the public and each one benefits two mild conditions, the application fees alone will be $3 million before you’ve even begun to prepare your evidence.
The experience in Australia has been that the preparation of a single application can cost in excess of $100,000.
These restrictions are so costly that most suppliers will simply refrain from making health claims, so you’ll have less information. Many will go out of business.
The net effect of these regulations will be that consumers will have less information than they did before.
Restrictions on scientific information regarding serious illness
Did you know that the simple kitchen spice turmeric is effective in preventing bowel cancer?
There are a lot of studies.
New Zealand has one of the highest death rates from bowel cancer in the developed world.
Studies show that garlic, ginger, turmeric, thyme, rosemary, sage, spearmint and peppermint all inhibit the growth of colon cancer cells.
A study found that one third of patients with end-stage bowel cancer, for whom no other treatment options existed, improved after treatment with turmeric extract.
If the bill is passed, I would not be allowed to tell you this and could be liable for a substantial fine.
So there are restrictions on free speech
It has been proven for years that garlic benefits healthy heart conditions. No one selling garlic will be allowed to communicate this factual scientific information. Thereby the bill will restrict free speech and suppress matters of fact.
There’ll be restrictions on health claims
A consignment of this product, Vicks vapour rub, was seized by Medsafe officials in May 2016 and destroyed because the label made this unapproved health claim:
APPLY TO THE CHEST, THROAT AND BACK FOR THREE-WAY RELIEF FROM BLOCKED NOSE, COUGH AND BODY ACHE.
Thousands of products could be snagged by this rule.
Restrictions on dose
In 2016 the Ministry of Health believed that the maximum daily dose of vitamin B12 should be 50 micrograms. This product, vitamin B 12, is commonly used by people who are deficient, [and] each dose [is] 20 times the maximum daily dose specified by the Ministry of Health. So it could be banned.
A typical Indian or Thai meal may contain 50 grams of tamarind. The maximum daily dose of tamarind that has been permitted by the bill is 500 milligrams, that is 100 times smaller than the amount you might consume in a meal.
Civil servants have been employed to make up this ridiculous rule and hundreds more like it.
Banned ingredients
Even though this traditional coffee substitute contains only natural plants, it will be banned by the bill because it contains an ingredient that is listed under the medicines act.
A sort of reverse patenting that bans herbs if they are used to make medicines.
Hundreds of traditional remedies will disappear.
Neem is one of the world’s most revered traditional healing plants with many medical uses. Among its many uses, it reduces inflammation associated with internal ulcers. It’s so effective that pharmaceutical companies have tried to patent this plant.
The regulator is likely to classify this herb as suitable for external use only. Effectively banning its traditional use for no reason.
This popular form of vitamin C could be banned because it contains a derivative of lecithin (commonly used in chocolate and other supermarket products), which in 2016, was classified by the Ministry of Health as for “external use only”.
Restrictions on traditional Indian and Chinese medicine
The bill will empower the regulator to restrict the traditional practices of ethnic communities, and it will violate the Bill of Rights.
More than 150 commonly used Indian herbs and a similar number of Chinese herbs were wrongly placed on a not-permitted list by the Ministry of Health in 2016.
To a large extent, this is because many traditional herbs have been found to be so healthy that they have been used to develop medicines and therefore these ingredients will be restricted in natural health products.
There are more than 10,000 traditional healing herbs. It will cost more than $100 million to register their healing properties, so in effect, their use will likely cease in New Zealand.
Just look at this list. This is just a short extract from 300 herbs that the Ministry of Health sought to restrict in 2016, the last time they tried to introduce a bill of this type.
These are foods that we consume many of us regularly, why should they be restricted – it doesn’t make any sense.
What will it cost you?
And these restrictions are going to cost a lot. Last week a 50-gram packet of Rubia cordifolia, a herb used to make healthy tea, cost $12.
After the bill is passed, the same packet may cost $60 to $80, just due to the compliance clock costs.
There are over 100,000 eligible plants. It will take an army of civil servants years to classify even a small proportion of them.
Assessment costs will be paid by the manufacturing industry so the cost of natural health products will obviously rise dramatically.
What will escape regulation
Well, many unhealthy products will be allowed to be sold without regulation.
Sugary drinks, hard fat, synthetic flavours and alcohol will continue to be sold unimpeded…
while the government pours millions of dollars and years of fruitless effort into controlling products that are already known to be safe and healthy foods.
This would be ridiculous if it wasn’t immoral and criminal.
There is absolutely no need for the government to regulate natural foods that are based on DNA that are used in natural health products.
Natural foods and herbs should be automatically excluded from regulation. There is no need to do this.
Meanwhile, there is a crisis in healthcare
Medical misadventure, experimentation and interventions have just become the number one cause of death in the world.
Healthcare costs are spiralling out of control.
Mental illness has quadrupled.
Cancers, chronic diseases, heart disease and many other conditions are increasing to epidemic proportions. All-cause mortality is rising.
Clearly, something has gone horribly wrong. But no one knows quite why.
There is no doubt that food additives and the drugs we take play a pivotal role in the development of disease.
There have been multiple failures in the regulatory processes which approve agricultural practices food and medicine.
How has this happened?
The process of regulation has moved away from science and become a cosy relationship between industry and regulators permitting unsafe and inappropriate products onto the market.
The bill, the proposed bill, represents a new phase of this cosy relationship. Regulators worldwide are cooperating to place restrictions on natural health products. And this will only benefit multinational companies.
What can we do to reverse this trend?
There is a scientific standard, scientific approach, to identify cause
Eliminate suspected causal factors and reintroduce them one by one.
Dr Dee Mangin at Otago Medical School, has found that if you stop all non-essential medication for the elderly, their health improves.
Dr Julia Rutledge at Canterbury University has found that greatly improved nutrition benefits children with ADHD.
Dr Kulreet Chaudhary, a renowned San Diego neurologist, has found that her patients, including MS sufferers, improved dramatically when placed on a traditional herbal diet.
These are just pointers to the many scientific preventive approaches to health care, which are springing up everywhere based on natural foods.
So why is our parliament planning to restrict natural health products?
We need to remind ourselves there is no evidence that natural health products are unsafe.
In fact, there’s a great deal of evidence that they benefit health and prevent illness.
Natural health products are traditionally made from plants and animal products which are based on DNA and natural minerals.
Our digestive system has developed to easily metabolise food based on DNA without side effects.
Many people rely on natural health products to maintain their health. It will be criminally negligent to restrict their options.
True natural health products are in fact foods.
There is nothing risky about their use.
Taking natural health products is no different from the need to have a balanced meal.
Food is life. It is our first medicine.
The healing properties of plants are proven to benefit public health. Our right to use them should not be taken away by law and transferred to pharmaceutical interests.
We are a people here who believe in fairness.
This is not the time for New Zealand to become involved in an international effort to subvert regulatory safeguards.
This is not the time to restrict access to preventive health care.
This is not the time to allow suspected unhealthy synthetic ingredients to be included in natural health products.
This is not the time to restrict access to herbs and impose huge unjustified costs on traditional medicine.
This is a time for New Zealand to lead the world in the development of application of preventive approaches to health care.
The therapeutic products bill is currently up for public submissions up until February 15, 2023.
Ask your MP to review this presentation, which shows that the bill relies upon outdated and discredited ideas.
Or you can contact me directly at my email ghatchard@gmail.com or go to my website for more information. Thank you
Guy Hatchard, PhD, was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.
%20%E2%80%A2%20Instagram%20photos%20and%20videos(1).png)
%20%E2%80%A2%20Instagram%20photos%20and%20videos.png)
Friday, January 13, 2023
Tuesday, January 10, 2023
“...when a Government is evoking emergency powers to shut down a legitimate protest, that is tyranny. When a Government accuses its own population of being misogynist, and racist, simply to shut down dissent, that is tyranny, ... one of the things mainstream does is elevate fringe ideas to dismiss legitimate dissent... National Governments have been co-opted by centralising, globalist interests, ” - Russel Brand
Monday, January 9, 2023
Our conventional understanding of human history is wrong. Our species did not spend 95 percent of its evolutionary past in tiny bands of hunter-gatherers. So what were we doing all that time? Agriculture and cities did not mean a plunge into hierarchy and domination. So where does inequality really come from? The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity - PART 1 & 2 - David Graeber, David Wengrow
"Our conventional understanding of human history is wrong. Our species did not spend 95 percent of its evolutionary past in tiny bands of hunter-gatherers. So what were we doing all that time? Agriculture and cities did not mean a plunge into hierarchy and domination. So where does inequality really come from? Drawing on findings from his best-selling book, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity - co-authored with the late David Graeber - David Wengrow explains how archaeology and anthropology are providing startling new answers to these major questions, revealing a prehistoric world more varied and unexpected than we knew, and a future more open and free than we imagine."
"The Dawn of Everything challenges our assumptions about the origins of
farming, property, cities, democracy and slavery and, in doing this,
overturns everything we thought we knew about human behaviour. It also
offers a path toward imagining new forms of freedom and new ways of
organising society."
PDF link
Friday, January 6, 2023
Swine flu vaccine (1976), 1 serious event per 100,000 vaccinees, Vaccine withdrawn Rotavirus vaccine Rotashield, (1999),1 to 2 serious events per 10,000 vaccinees, Vaccine withdrawn Covid mRNA vaccines, 1 serious event per 800 vaccinees, Vaccine officially promoted - Vaccine adverse reactions, reanalysis of mRNA trial data
Sunday, January 1, 2023
Wonderful Woman (Demo) by The Smiths
Wonderful Woman Here her head, she lay Until she'd rise and say, "I'm starved of mirth, Let's go and trip a dwarf" Oh, what to be done with her? Oh, what to be done with her? Ice water for blood With neither heart or spine And then just To pass time; let us go and rob the blind What to be done with her? I ask myself, What to be said of her? But when she calls me, I do not walk, I run Oh, when she calls, I do not walk, I run
A New Understanding of Human History and the Roots of Inequality | David Wengrow
"I always looked upon civilization as a game changer for us and to think about the attribute of inequality it had never crossed my mind until I heard this talk. This changed my whole perception of humanity and I always thought democracy was the solution invented by us to solve the problems of class division and ensure representation in society. But, to think democracy is innate to us as humans make sense since even though we had many past events that have changed us within, humanity survives because we have democracy within and between us."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)