Wells Tao
Just sent info to my MP. Why not do yours? Takes 2 minutes.
here's the transcript version of video to include in emails:
"BOMBSHELL REVELATION
NZTSOS
have uncovered a ‘Science and Insights’ report that was published by
the Ministry of Health in Oct 2021, which totally demolishes the Labour
Government’s narrative around the ‘grave risk’ that existed in schools
and healthcare settings at the time.
Because
of this discovery, we now know that before the Health and Education
mandate order was signed, the government had in its possession
high-quality evidence that the risk of transmission in schools and
healthcare settings was insignificant, and that the vaccination mandate
was therefore totally unnecessary.
There’s
no easy way around the importance of this document. It’s the Ministry’s
own contact-tracing data. It has a very large sample size making it
highly reliable (over 11,000 education contacts were analysed), and it’s
the most relevant piece of information that they would have had in
their possession in relation to the vaccine mandate. It told the
government that in Healthcare settings only one in 500 contacts became
infected, while in Educational settings, just one in 1,000 contacts
became infected.
Yet,
knowing all this, Hipkins went ahead and signed the mandate order that
brought so much unnecessary pain and suffering on so many.
Can it get any worse than this? Well, unfortunately, it can!
Health
and Education workers (NZDSOS and NZTSOS) went to the High Court in
March 2022 to have the vaccination mandate order declared unlawful. The
Crown produced sworn affidavits from four witnesses (Mr Hipkins, Ms
Mackay, Dr Town and Dr Bloomfield), with Drs Town and Bloomfield being
accepted by the court as ‘expert witnesses’.
Now,
there are very strict rules that control the evidence of an ‘expert
witness’. They must swear to assist the court ‘impartially’, and also
that they will tell the court if any part of their evidence is
‘incomplete or inaccurate without some qualification’. Drs Town and
Bloomfield both would have known about this highly relevant MoH
analysis, but they did not reveal this to the court. NZTSOS believe that
by keeping this from the high Court Drs Town and Bloomfield clearly
contravened the rules for expert witnesses, and potentially open
themselves to a charge of perjury.
Another
Crown witness, Ms Mackay, also kept highly relevant information from
the court. She correctly told the court that only eleven ‘applications’
for ‘Serious Service Disruption’ (SSD) exemptions had been granted, but
failed to tell the court that one application alone was for 971 workers,
and that by the date of her affidavit these 11 ‘applications’ covered a
total of 2,833 workers – all of this while hundreds of other fine
workers were being terminated because of what the court approvingly
termed the governments ‘zero-tolerance’ approach. If only the court had
known!
NZTSOS
is now seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, and one of their
claims is that these serious omissions in the evidence presented by the
Crown’s witnesses has led to a ‘miscarriage of justice’.
What
can you do to help? Well, if the NZTSOS appeal is accepted, they’re
going to need financial help, but that can wait for the moment. Right
now, they need everyone who’s been affected by the mandate to help share
this bombshell revelation. We need to make it difficult for the Supreme
Court to quietly decline their application in the hope that it will
just go away. So, can you write to your MP? Can you share this post with
others? If we all do our bit to publicise this bombshell, we may yet
succeed in holding to account those who have perpetrated this grave
injustice."
No comments:
Post a Comment