"A sock stretched over a badly made wooden frame, it’s a smart conceptualist riposte to modernism’s pretensions."
Badly made? I made it perfectly. It is perfect. It's not a plane it's not suppose to fly. How can my work be badly made? Compared to what? A 'normal' work of art? These I guess are some the questions I wish were asked about my work. The craft of the capitalist commodity, where do these airs come from? Riposte? Modernist pretensions? Since when, in what era ever is effortlessness bad? Machine like grace is our highest ideal, effortlessness and endlessness happens to be it, look around at Capitalists efforts to attain this. Isn't mine actually closer, closer to a 'human' version?
Since when is perfect economic and physical exertion retaliation? How is it not leadership and an existing modelling of the ideal? Recycled found materials, tacked effortlessly together to find significant/ undenied form is something, still everything that capitalist art and it's total domination of all art psyche rejects, deeply, instinctively.
Art market, where the 'craft' is to separate and destroy the history of it's making, the politics of its economic material phenomenon, creating the uber important 'glamour' (as in without genitalia), positing my efforts of a new path into the subversive and forever titillating 'bad' other; that will never be visited for it pulls down the 'wrong path". But "that's what we love about you Tao!"
No, you don't know me at all. Strange how my work is not seen in the context I have so publicly made, yet I'm constantly criticized for standing in front of the work! You've just shoved the work shoddily into conveniently provided roles that maintain a certain lid on the too hard to ask basket of questions. That basket of capitalist status quo, I am not a part of, (but you are Tao you are! Yeah Like Cuba is to the US).
Even today welfarians are considered a threat to capitalism, yet we heroically controlled inflation, now you'r gonna pay. To bridge over this, is to smother it, to deny it exists. Let's say the bad are smart, but wrong. Let's clap their critique of our silly pretensions, while we return to worshiping at the alter of silly pretensions. It's convenient. Not badly made, but perfect. A frame that re-frames ALL the other art. Forever.
Hey Mark Amery, thanks so much for daring to touch the hot spot. Sincerely thank you, I do love to respond. Much love. T
‘Antique bird-like chatter’: mis-competence in New Zealand electronic music – Bruce Russell
2w
- Reply
- 3w
- Edited
- Reply
- 3w
- Reply
- 3w
- Edited
- Reply
- 3w
- Reply
- 3w
14 Comments
Wells Tao
Stretched ankle sock, retired. Over kindling.
3
Ross Forbes
The
wierd, wierd thing is that I recognised Megan's work .She painted it 25
years back when we lived together in a warehouse in Grey Lynn. We were
together 8 years and then one day she was gone. No disrespect Tao...your
work is great...
Wells Tao
Far out so sorry to hear that.
1
Wells Tao
No
disrespect felt at all, I remember seeing her work and feeling it at
Mark's place, probably what made me want to give him one of my works, to
be cared for the way he cared for her work... thanks for the
compliment.
1
Mark Amery
Love to you Ross!!!
1
Mark Amery
Tao
this is exactly why I love it. Wy would it hang there for 10 years if
it was "badly made" in quote marks. I think my word is wrong - though
wrongly made might be worse - beautifully badly made better. So here's
the point - it's difficult to describe because it doesn't conform. I'll
give up again now. (PS I want to know what's happening anon with your
good film)
1
- Reply
- 3w
Murtle Presence
Makes
me think of the term 'Mis-competence', defined by Bruce Russell as “the
ability to do something both deliberately wrongly, and well”. https://soundbleedjournal.wordpress.com/.../antique-bird.../
SOUNDBLEEDJOURNAL.WORDPRESS.COM
‘Antique bird-like chatter’: mis-competence in New Zealand electronic music – Bruce Russell
2
- Reply
- 3w
Wells Tao
Cheers
Mark! Yeah nice Murtle, technically better, but still doesn't suggest
to me a ring of confidence, which is what I think it has. Assemblage
isn't looked at like a mistake, the mistake is intentional, there is no
mistake. It's a dialectical or dichotomy that the status quo uses to
dominate and profit from. it's no small thing.
- Reply
- 3w
Wells Tao
How
it was made was chosen and executed perfectly. It's something of a
mystery to me why the viewer wouldn't accept that. Embrace that. Promote
that. But as I said above, there are many reasons.
1
- Reply
- 3w
Wells Tao
From my limited vocab, I would say that it is "brutalist /assemblage/ art povera"
1
- Reply
- 3w
- Edited
Andrew Clifford
This
reminds me of a conversation with Chris Knox, who once corrected me
that his music is not lo-fi - it is low-tech. Lo-fi suggests it's badly
recorded. There's nothing wrong with the way it is recorded, which
perfectly captures the low-tech instruments that he uses. Or maybe my
memory has merged some of Bruce's writing and Chris's comments -
different arguments, same conclusion
1
- Reply
- 3w
Mark Amery
Murtle Presence totally!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2w
Mark Amery
Andrew Clifford and again correct. Its clear I didn't find the right words for what was meant as a compliment
1
- Reply
- 2w
Wells Tao
Andrew Clifford
there is a kin kind of correlation for sure, but again it doesn't speak
to the degree of economic segregation/ oppression that is an intimate
part of the mode. It doesn't talk about the threat it represents. How
convenient
1
Reply
Edited
No comments:
Post a Comment