On the Subject of Quitting
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed, 03 Dec 2010
My head is swimming. My hands are shaking. My teeth are grinding together so hard that my jaw muscles look like I'm storing walnuts in there for the winter.
For once, these symptoms are not being caused by politics. I have not had a cigarette in four days. I have been gobbling nicotine lozenges like M&M's, and am breathing freely for the first time in twenty years. I think I've got this thing licked.
As it turns out, I picked exactly, precisely the right week to undertake this daunting exercise. I might as well have; with everything that has been going on, the physical symptoms I have been suffering - wooziness, tremors, grinding teeth, anxiousness, sleeplessness, and the occasional bout of extreme rage - would have been present anyway. Might as well have something good come out of it.
It was the right time to quit, because if I had still been smoking this week, I would have been sorely tempted to stab a butt out in my eyes, to spare me from having to witness a Democratic presidential administration fly apart at the seams...and not because of some nefarious right-wing plot or media malfeasance. No, Mr. Obama and the pinheads who advise him did this to themselves, and it is disgraceful beyond all measure to behold.
A federal wage freeze was how the week began. Really, Mr. President? What's next? A big sign on the White House lawn saying, "The GOP was right. - BHO" would not surprise me. Way to concede a very contested economic point without putting up even the slightest indication of a fight. Paul Krugman said it best on Friday:
After the Democratic "shellacking" in the midterm elections, everyone wondered how President Obama would respond. Would he show what he was made of? Would he stand firm for the values he believes in, even in the face of political adversity?
On Monday, we got the answer: he announced a pay freeze for federal workers. This was an announcement that had it all. It was transparently cynical; it was trivial in scale, but misguided in direction; and by making the announcement, Mr. Obama effectively conceded the policy argument to the very people who are seeking - successfully, it seems - to destroy him.
So I guess we are, in fact, seeing what Mr. Obama is made of.
It got worse as the week went on. A dog-and-pony meeting between Mr. Obama and congressional Republicans yielded one of the most ridiculous presidential statements since Richard Nixon's demented, gin-soaked farewell address. According to White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, Mr. Obama took responsibility for the partisan tone in Washington DC. "The president acknowledged he needed to do better," said Gibbs.
Really.
As a quick recap, before he was even inaugurated, Republican members of Congress were calling President Obama a Marxist Hitler on the House floor. (Had that ever happened before?) Then there was Jim DeMint, who compared Obama to Napoleon and Hitler in the same month. Let's not forget Michele Bachmann's warning that Obama was going to brainwash our children in Marxist gulags to go with her constant hectoring about "socialism."
Then came the Birther Caucus - that group of 17 Republican lawmakers who questioned Obama's citizenship and even introduced legislation which suggested the President isn't quite American. And when Obama planned to address the nation's school children on their first day of class, Republicans rioted.
We can't leave out Republican Joe Wilson's shouting "You lie!" during the State of the Union - which was also without precedent, not to mention the House Republicans cheering their en masse vote against the stimulus, the "death panels," and "pulling the plug on grandma." Can't leave out Lamar Smith (R-TX) suggesting Obama should be impeached for not protecting the border. And who can forget Republican members of Congress proudly speaking at event under a banner that compared the law to the holocaust - all while Republican officials nationwide almost weekly compared Obama to Hitler.
There is a lot of talk about Mr. Obama's character, or lack thereof, these days. He's not a fighter, he's too conciliatory, he's weak, he's unprepared, he's a secret Republican, etc. I have an outside-the-box theory about Obama that may explain all this: Stockholm Syndrome. The malady arises when a hostage situation goes on long enough that the hostages begin to identify with their captors, and in some cases, go so far as to stand up for them, and even defend them in public and in the courts. The GOP has been pounding on Mr. Obama since his presidential campaign began almost four years ago, and I think the pressure and stress might have blended his sense of direction. Left has suddenly become right, and the Democratic President of the United States has become the most eloquent advocate for everything he was elected to put a stop to.
If the White House needed any further evidence that their conciliatory approach (read: retreat) will never, ever, ever, ever yield results with the GOP, all they had to do was check the news wires approximately 0.0000034 seconds after the "meeting" with the GOP ended. After coming together with the president to talk about trying to get along, the GOP emerged and announced with one voice that they would block every single piece of legislation - including a bill to make sure unemployed people don't lose their benefits on the doorstep of Christmas - until Congress made permanent George W. Bush's tax cuts for rich people. As of this writing, it looks for all the world like the White House is going to cave on this issue as well. Hope. Change. Fail.
And, hard as it is to believe, the worst was yet to come.
In its first months in office, the Obama administration sought to protect Bush administration officials facing criminal investigation overseas for their involvement in establishing policies the that governed interrogations of detained terrorist suspects. A "confidential" April 17, 2009, cable sent from the US embassy in Madrid to the State Department - one of the 251,287 cables obtained by WikiLeaks - details how the Obama administration, working with Republicans, leaned on Spain to derail this potential prosecution.
. . .
Back when it seemed that this case could become a major international issue, during an April 14, 2009, White House briefing, I asked press secretary Robert Gibbs if the Obama administration would cooperate with any request from the Spaniards for information and documents related to the Bush Six. He said, "I don't want to get involved in hypotheticals." What he didn't disclose was that the Obama administration, working with Republicans, was actively pressuring the Spaniards to drop the investigation. Those efforts apparently paid off, and, as this WikiLeaks-released cable shows, Gonzales, Haynes, Feith, Bybee, Addington, and Yoo owed Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thank-you notes.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus...and with any luck, he will put some courage in Mr. Obama's stocking this year, right next to the lump of coal the president's dismal, disappointing, demoralizing performance has earned him. In one week, the man certified the viability of Republican economic policy in the face of overwhelming evidence that Republicans have no economic policy beyond "We Like Rich People." He took responsibility for the crappy tone in Washington while being called a Nazi terrorist Marxist socialist non-citizen. He appeared all too ready to capitulate on the Bush tax cuts, even as an overwhelming majority of Americans want them done away with.
And to cap it all off, the Wikileaks document dump exposed the fact that Mr. Obama and his people went out of their way to derail even the most outside chance that some form of justice might be done after eight years of rampant Bush-era criminality. Mr. Obama waxed positively lyrical about the need to seek that justice during his presidential campaign. From the look of things, that promise - like so many others he made on the trail - turned to dust the moment he entered the Oval Office.
I quit smoking this week. The President quit on me this week. I know a whole lot of people who are about to quit on him, if they haven't already.
- Wells Tao Julian Assange:
The west has fiscalised its basic power relationships through a web of contracts, loans, shareholdings, bank holdings and so on. In such an environment it is easy for speech to be "free" because a change in political will rarely leads to any change in these basic instruments. Western speech, as something that rarely has any effect on power, is, like badgers and birds, free. In states like China, there is pervasive censorship, because speech still has power and power is scared of it. We should always look at censorship as an economic signal that reveals the potential power of speech in that jurisdiction. The attacks against us by the US point to a great hope, speech powerful enough to break the fiscal blockade. - Mac Willson the real problem w/govt these days. well, probably ever. -they're so busy wthe backroom stuff -alliances, fiscal deals and shit, they can't see forest when it comes to real issues that need some attention.
- Wells Tao Well, time for artists like you and I to make better work and redirect the message to the people.
- Mac Willson it's dangerous work, ya know. you're aware of this, I'm sure.
- Wells Tao To be honest we like it dangerous, Dangerous art should be about risking life but not losing it.
- Mac Willson we?
- Mac Willson there will be a loss of life, always is w/this shit, right? maybe Assange himself will meet an early end one way or other. but his message has been born. there's no stopping it. it's an awesome new force in the world. I'm amazed by the whole thing.
- Wells Tao yeah I was a bit short on options with the 'we' bit, oh for a second or third language!
- Mac Willson ah. what's your 1st language?
- Wells Tao I'd struggle to rank them in a particular order, criteria wouldn't stand still
No comments:
Post a Comment