Jarad BryantThey
spun all sorts of ideas about spending a lot of money very well...
though those old enough to remember (ie not the well off woke young
labour city kids)... that Tony Blair also spun the idea of spending a
lot of money and the money ran out. Once b…See More
Wells TaoThe best movies, films, and documentaries of 2019 ranked by movie experts
Cambridge
Analytica stole the data of 87 million Facebook users and then utilized
it to target swing voters with political propaganda on behalf of
clients like Brexit and the 2016 Trump
campaign. And yet somehow, that villainous firm isn’t even the most vile
player in The Great Hack, since that goes to Facebook, which not only
collaborated with Cambridge Analytica (and failed to control it), but
also allowed itself to become the preeminent platform for wide-scale,
democracy-undermining disinformation operations. With both dynamism and
comprehensiveness, Karim Amer and Jehane Noujaim’s infuriating
documentary details the Cambridge Analytica scandal via the work of
reporters and whisteblowers intent on exposing the company’s function as
a tool of right-wing extremists both in America and abroad. In doing
so, it reveals a terrifying digital new world order where data is the
most valuable commodity, as well as the key to conducting psychological
warfare on a heretofore unheard-of scale. It’s the horror film of the
year.
Jarad BryantSpinning
that you will spend 500 billion pounds on green energy might poll well
on twitter... though the working class will be saying how about 500
billion on our towns and better job's? Young Momentum
activists are in many ways out of touch with everyday people... so to
spin effectivly maybe don't use their ideological talking points.
Wells TaoThe best movies, films, and documentaries of 2019 ranked by movie experts
Cambridge
Analytica stole the data of 87 million Facebook users and then utilized
it to target swing voters with political propaganda on behalf of
clients like Brexit and the 20…See More
Jarad BryantWells Tao
Yes interesting disturbing stuff, though how accurate is it all? This
is an interesting review I read when it came out that goes into it a
bit...
"A
new film chronicles the fall of Cambridge Analytica, a political
consultancy that used data to form psychological profiles of voters,
without much insight or novelty
A HACK, as it is
commonly understood, is when someone stealthily gains access to a
computer system using vulnerabilities in the code or by tricking a
gullible user into revealing their credentials. Asking a user of a
computer or social network to click on an “I agree” button and then
harvesting their data in order to influence them is not a hack. It is
the business model of the internet.
Cambridge
Analytica, the now-defunct political consultancy that was at the heart
of an exposé by the New York Times and the Observer of sloppy privacy
practices at Facebook, no more hacked into a computer than did this
reviewer’s aunt. But, much like said aunt, the company displayed an
uncommon interest in people’s personal lives, and was only too happy to
share that information with others. Viewers ought to suspect from the
title alone that “The Great Hack”, a documentary about Cambridge
Analytica and “the dark side of social media”, is likely to be a bit
over-the-top. And it is.
The film focuses on three
characters. David Carroll (pictured) is an American professor who asked
Cambridge Analytica for the information it held on him, exercising a
right enshrined in Britain’s Data Protection Act of 1998 and normally
understood to be reserved for Europeans. (The Information Commissioner’s
Office agreed with his reading of the law that the right applies to
anyone whose data are processed in the United Kingdom.) Carole
Cadwalladr is a journalist for the Observer in London: her stories on
Cambridge Analytica captured the public imagination in 2018 and
subsequently led to multiple inquiries and investigations in Britain and
America, the eventual demise of the company and the continuing scrutiny
of Facebook by both media and governments. Brittany Kaiser is a former
business-development director for Cambridge Analytica, as well as a
campaigner for Barack Obama turned conservative political operative. Her
lack of moral compass and shaded intentions make her the most
interesting figure of the lot. Thankfully, she gets the most screen
time. Less happily, the makers take everything she—and everyone
else—says at face value.
When Mr Carroll says that
online advertising is a trillion-dollar industry, he goes unchallenged.
(It is much smaller.) When Ms Kaiser claims that “last year data
surpassed oil in its value”, the film-makers put that on their website.
(No such measure exists.) When Ms Cadwalladr notes that “conducting
large-scale analysis of a population and then identifying the triggers
that are going to move them from one state to another state...feels very
challenging to…the idea of democracy”, nobody points out that that is
the definition of advertising. Large chunks of the film are made up of
Cambridge Analytica sales decks, which the directors appear to take as
gospel truth about how sophisticated and successful the company was. So
credulous is “The Great Hack” that if Cambridge Analytica had not shut
down, its bosses would be using the movie as a testimonial.
It
is unclear, to this reviewer at least, what the point is of “The Great
Hack”. If it is to use Cambridge Analytica to bring to a wider audience
the reality that tech companies exploit their users’ data and are often
indiscriminate in the ways in which they go about it, then it is merely
beating a severely ill horse. This much is, by the middle of 2019,
common currency, thanks in large part to Ms Cadwalladr’s reporting. Even
lay citizens today are familiar with misinformation and clickbait on
social networks. Among more involved observers, it is facial recognition
and artificial intelligence that now elicit the most worry.
The
film’s near-exclusive focus on Cambridge Analytica is strange, too. It
may make for a neat narrative arc, with a clear end point when the
company folds, but that means “The Great Hack” is barely able to address
the problems of the broader ad ecosystem, or why the web today is such a
wretched place. When it does, eventually, broaden out, it does so using
innuendo and conflating different things, spookily intoning about
Russians or populists. Propaganda campaigns on Whatsapp in Brazil may be
a problem, but they have little to do with the data-mining, ad-serving
or algorithmic content recommendations that plague Facebook and its ilk.
That
Cambridge Analytica gained access to the Facebook data of tens of
millions of Americans through sneaky means, did not delete the
information when asked, was able to create detailed profiles and glean
insights that informed political strategy for election-winning
candidates, and, moreover, that it was just one small part of an online
ad industry that surveils everybody on the planet through questionable
consent is a story worth telling. It would have been worth telling well,
too.
Perhaps “The Great Hack” is the documentary
the Facebook era deserves. Like an argument on the social network, it is
tedious, seemingly complicated but intellectually underdeveloped,
crammed with false facts and exaggerated statistics and features several
blowhards who veer between self-righteous and self-congratulatory. Like
one of those arguments, nobody comes out looking good in the end."
Paul GilbertIt's not failure to spin. It's what narrative gets repeated, how gets reported.
So
in NZ, National's Key/English policies were reported in their own words
"National is commiting XXX to infrastructure which will bring xx $
jobs." This runs the headline…See More
Wells TaoThe best movies, films, and documentaries of 2019 ranked by movie experts
Cambridge
Analytica stole the data of 87 million Facebook users and then utilized
it to target swing voters with political propaganda on behalf of
clients like Brexit and the 2016 Trump
campaign. And yet somehow, that villainous firm isn’t even the most vile
player in The Great Hack, since that goes to Facebook, which not only
collaborated with Cambridge Analytica (and failed to control it), but
also allowed itself to become the preeminent platform for wide-scale,
democracy-undermining disinformation operations. With both dynamism and
comprehensiveness, Karim Amer and Jehane Noujaim’s infuriating
documentary details the Cambridge Analytica scandal via the work of
reporters and whisteblowers intent on exposing the company’s function as
a tool of right-wing extremists both in America and abroad. In doing
so, it reveals a terrifying digital new world order where data is the
most valuable commodity, as well as the key to conducting psychological
warfare on a heretofore unheard-of scale. It’s the horror film of the
year.
Robyn ConwayWhen
spin means lying, distorting and manipulating to get the results you
believe you're entitled to? Labour's campaign in the UK elections was
truthful. Too many just didn't care about the hundreds of lies the
Tories told them, they preferred simple Tory slogans like, "Get Brexit
Done!"
Wells TaoSpinning
isn't always about lying as far as I understand it. But it does
successfully fuck with the dominant narrative. It appears Labour failed
to engage
Robyn ConwayLabour
didn't "fail to engage" as much as present their excellent manifesto to
the people who needed it most but who'd lost any ability to trust the
word of politicians yet were willing to listen to the pro-Tory
propaganda of the far right tabloids and…See More
Paul GilbertWells Tao My point exactly. which is a concession that it is not a failure to spin. as I said at the outset. you gotta play a different game, can't win on their terms.
Wells TaoPaul Gilbert
ugh, what are you trying to spin! Give up on the win, here it was a
huge loss. There is only one game, and the left here in NZ could show
Labour how to avoid some basic errors. But Yes! You DO need to change
the terms, you need to sell them and win at selling the terms or your
fucked. It's that easy.